pablo-picasso.paintings.namePablo Picasso cubism

During the early days of cubism historians attributed the creation of cubism to one man: Pablo Picasso. Now we know that he has to share to honor with Georges Braque. Braque had studied Cézanne’s method of representing three dimensions as seen from several viewpoints, in the same year (1907) that Picasso created his Les Demoiselles d’Avignon. In this painting Picasso depicts human figures by making use of several viewpoints, which became one of the characteristic features of cubism. Arriving at the concept of depicting an object as seen from different viewpoints independently, Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque soon became good friends and went on to develop the visual language of cubism in close cooperation, an alliance that Picasso would sometimes call a marriage . Les Demoiselles d’Avignon represents Picasso’s époque negre which was inspired by African art and overlaps the first phase in cubism, which is called analytical cubism . Analytical cubism lasted until 1911 and is characterized by monochrome, relatively unemotional paintings that depict rather uneventful subjects, such as still lives. Many paintings of analytical cubism are faceted (see for instance Georges Braque’s "Mandola", below), a technique that allows the artist to disect and reconstruct his subject in a way that depicts its essence rather than its appearance. Although largely abstract, the faceted technique still produces a recognizable image of the subject. The technique of faceting originated from Georges Braques - it was his way to depict a natural object. Picasso didn’t so much facet natural objects, but used the geometry of Braques’ faceted paintings to create a style that was abstract in essence, almost pure abstract art. So cubism refers to the styles of both Braques and Picasso, although Braques’ cubism has a recognizable figurative objective, while Picasso’s cubism served as the link between Braques’ style and pure the abstract art that followed from cubism (such as Piet Mondrian and suprematism ). From 1911 on cubism moved in a direction which is now known as synthetic cubism . In both analytical and synthetic cubism the subject would be fragmented, in analytical cubism giving rise to a crystalline geometry, while in synthetic cubism the fragmentation would be somewhat reduced in size, making the subject more recognizable and less formal. In both styles a subject would be reconstructed in intersecting, sometimes transparent planes. A faisionable object of speculation and intellectualization at the end of the 19th century was the so-called fourth dimension, in which it would be possible to simultaneously discern all sides of a three-dimensional object ¹ . It seems evident that cubism was a product of the intellectual climate of its time and this may have been of influence on Picasso aiming to depict three dimensional objects in a two dimensional plane. Cubism: origin of the term To understand where the term cubism comes from, we have to digress on the rivalry that existed between Picasso and Matisse. The latter’s Blue Nude painting had caused a public scandal at the Salons des Indépendent (annual Paris art show of contemporary French art) and had caused art critic Louis Vauxcelles to refer to Matisse and his followers as Les Fauves (the wild animals), which led to Fauvism and made Matisse’s reputation as the leading avant-garde artist, something he was very fond of. Matisse’s reputation had grown to the point that he had been allowed to become one of the Salon’s jury members. When Picasso had produced his Demoiselles, many young artists that had previously followed Matisse, began to follow Picasso is his radical new style of painting. One of the converts was Georges Braque and when he submitted a series of paintings to the Salon, Matisse, who was infuriated by Braque’s defection, was instrumental in the Salon’s rejection of all of Braques’ works. When explaining to Vauxcelles (him again), Matisse made a drawing after one of Braque’s landscapes, to show how they were made out of ’little cubes’ and from there on "cubism" was a no-brainer for Vauxcelles. This however, had little to do with the technique of faceting that Braque and Picasso went on to develop. Braque’s paintings were just a prelude to a very different style, but the term cubism would stick. Noteworthy is the work of Piet Mondrian , who linearized cubism in his 1912 "Apple Tree" painting, a process which ultimately led to the first really non-figurative paintings (or pure abstract art), from 1914 on. An important difference between Picasso and the cubist Mondrian was that Picasso never really gave up the third dimension. He played with dimensions, flirted with removing the third, but never became a pure abstract painter. So deeply his figurative upbringing was engrained (he was an artistic prodigy and well-rounded figurative painter at 15), that one of the main creators of abstract art never made it to this development’s ultimate consequence: pure abstract art. In that sense Picasso wasn’t the radical and revolutionary that, during his cubist period he appeared to become; his cubist period was followed (leaving his cubist converts bewildered) by his neo-classicism, a return to tradition. From there on his recognition and wealth grew and his role as a bringer of fundamental change in the art of painting was over. Cubism and Picasso’s Style It is important to fully realize the importance of cubism. It isn’t just "Picasso’s style" but marks the real beginning of abstract art. Picasso’s predecessors, such as the impressionists, the fauvists and Cezanne were still principally tied to nature as a model to elaborate on. With Les Demoiselles d’Avignon Picasso reached a level of abstraction that was a radical enough break with the classical dominance of content over form, a hierarchy which is reversed in Les Demoiselles d’Avignon and the style which followed from it: Cubism. Speaking of "Picasso’s style", it is natural to associate Picasso with Cubism, which leads to people thinking that paintings such as "Femme en pleurs" are cubist. However, Picasso’s cubist period ended in 1915 and paintings such as Femme en pleurs (1937, see below) certainly aren’t cubist, although there are elements of cubism visible, as well as fauvism and many other styles. There is no -ism that characterizes paintings such as Femme en pleurs and its style is commonly known as, indeed, Picasso’s style . Picasso’s career is in fact a patchwork of different styles and in his classicist nudes for instance there are hardly any cubist influences visible. Maybe ironically or maybe typically, when Picasso’s work could be captured in an -ism, during his cubist period, his influence on art transcended the Picasso style and marked the beginning of a new era in modern art. Picasso’s style in its full form is a patchwork of ideas borrowed from classical artists and contempories like and El Greco, Matisse, Modigliani , Gauguin and Toulouse-Lautrec. However, a key-element of the Picasso style is the cubist geometry, which is Picasso’s own creation. After his cubist period, Picasso would come to depend on the work of his contempories, from which he would distill the essence, create his own version and incorporate it in his style. After the second world war the School of Paris would not be replaced with an artistic movement of comparable quality, denying Picasso the opportunity to be inspired by, and borrow from contemporary artists, and although he would go on to paint successfully in the Picasso style, he would never again be able to substantially innovate his style. Abstract art may be a 20th century creation, but it also marks the end of a process that started in the 18th century. Long before the invention of photography, philosophers began to question the narrative role of the art of painting, in which naturalism served to create an illusion of reality. Paintings would tell stories and depict actions and emotions; the content of a painting was its central...